Every new use case rebuilds the same plumbing from scratch.
ENTERPRISES / SOLUTION
One platform for a growing agent workforce.
The first agent is a project. The tenth is a platform problem. Shared retrieval, model routing, monitoring, and tuning are what make the second agent take weeks instead of months.
The problem today
Nobody can say which agents are performing and which have quietly drifted.
Model choices are locked into each app, so switching means a rewrite.
What the agent does
Ground
Shared retrieval over the sources your agents are allowed to read.
Route
The right model for each job, swappable without touching the app.
Observe
Every run logged with inputs, outputs, cost, and reviewer overrides.
Tune
Regular evaluation against a held-out set, with rollback if quality drops.
What it touches
- Knowledge sources
- Model gateway
- Vector store
- Identity
- Monitoring
- Evaluation
FAQ
Because the second and third will need the same retrieval, the same access controls, and the same monitoring. Building that once is cheaper by the third agent and much cheaper by the tenth.
No, and that's the point of routing. Models get chosen per job on results and cost, and swapped as better options appear, without rewriting the applications on top.
Continuous evaluation against a held-out set, tracked override rates from reviewers, and alerts when either moves. Drift is normal. Not noticing it is the failure.
